News, Reviews and more from Australia's Macintosh Authority
ADVERTISEMENT
The Great Amazon Delisting may be coming to an end, according to the New York Times. What no one can quite understand is why it happened at all, or took so long to resolve.
A little more than a week ago, Amazon removed all Macmillan books from its online store, both in Kindle versions and the dead-tree variety. This was in response to hardball negotiations between Macmillan and Amazon over pricing of Kindle e-books. Amazon, the market leader in the e-book market, wants to maintain pricing of new e-books at $US9.99 ($A11) to maintain the Kindle's dominance; Macmillan and other publishers, on the other hand, want to control the price of their electronic products.
It's unclear what effect a certain upstart in the iBooks... er, e-book market had on these negotiations, but few think it’s a coincidence that Amazon exercised the nuclear option only two days after Apple announced the iPad and its own online bookstore. Apple is offering publishers the right to set their own prices, and takes a 30 percent cut, much as it does for the App Store; in the book biz, this is called the “agency model,” and it’s what publishers have been pushing Amazon to adopt.
Two other major publishers are now on the agency model bandwagon, and Amazon has publicly capitulated to the new terms. But online Amazon sales continued merrily along for HarperCollins and Hachette all week, while it took five days for Amazon to flip the database switch for Macmillan.
Amazon has attempted to spin its actions as protecting the consumer interest in cheap e-books, but influential author and publisher blogs have generally ranged in calling the Amazon move something between ill-advised and stunningly boneheaded. Most readers, the reasoning goes, neither know nor care who publishes their favourite authors, or about the internecine negotiations between major players in the book market; all they see is that Amazon isn’t selling books they want to buy. Amazon’s move hurt Macmillan's bottom line for the last week, but if those customers bounced over to another online bookstore (or, heaven forfend, a brick-and-mortar store), the long term impact on sales will accrue far more to Amazon than anyone else.
Which seems an odd strategy, when Apple is perceived not as a new e-book startup, but rather the presumptive 800-pound gorilla. Apple has already crushed the competition in both the music and smartphone industries; Amazon may have a 12-length lead starting this race, but no one thinks the odds are 50-1 against Apple catching up. Five hundred dollars will buy you either a Kindle DX ebook reader, or (in two months) an iPad with many more features. Such as color. And 140,000 other applications.
In any case, some news outlets have jumped to the wrong conclusions regarding some aspects of this story (and noblesse oblige prevents me from including any links in this sentence). I don’t have any insider information, but I’ll put on my prognosticator hat and make a few predictions:
The timing of the announcement is a curious tactic for Apple. Announcing a refresh of a major product line six days out from theMacworld Expo is a little weird; I can't think why Steve Jobs wouldn'thave wanted to pull a big blue sheet off a Mac Pro (the Xserve marketis pretty specialised when you come to it) and startle the world withit. Then again, perhaps he's got something even snazzier in mind; aFlash-based MacBook Pro that costs $300, reads your mind, does yourironing and has a Time Machine that works with any wireless networkconnection.
Alex Kidman | Jan 10, 2008
The world has been rocked this week with the news that Apple has added Andrea Jung to its board of directors. That's right, that Andrea Jung, the CEO of Avon. That's right, that Avon, the door-to-door cosmetics company. Clearly this indicates a radical new direction in Apple's retail strategy: as well as mass-market retailers, specialised independent resellers, company-owned stores and of course online, Apple is now going to recruit an army of enthusiastic salespeople hoofing it from house to house with sample cases.
Matthew JC. Powell | Jan 11, 2008
It was one of those days. There's a maxim that to err is human, butto really stuff things up you need a computer. Robbie Burns also oncesaid (in my imagination) that "the best-laid plans of mice and men haveno chance againt modern technology". We had planned our coverage of the keynote so well. We had rehearsed, tested and run through. Nothing could go wrong.
Matthew JC. Powell | Jan 16, 2008
"Don't forget to get there very, very early", was the advice given to me by practically everyone prior to this morning's Macworld Conference Keynote. "Things get pretty hairy", they claimed -- and they weren't referencing Australian Macworld's fine editor. So at 5am, having been woken by the loud gentleman speaking German VERY LOUDLY, I prepared towander down the chilly streets of San Francisco and wait. And wait, and wait, and wait. Annoyance doesn't quite cover my mood when another Australian journalist makes an appearance two hours later, right behind me.
Alex Kidman | Jan 17, 2008
As I type these words, I am waiting for Apple's Developer Connection web site to ease up sufficiently for me to download the long-awaited Software Developer Kit for the iPhone (and iPod touch, just by the by). In a way, I hate developer-oriented announcements — "here's a really cool thing we're working on, and it's available now, and hoi polloi can have it in about six months". Actually, it's the six months I hate.